U.S. President plans to eliminate many tax loopholes that benefit high-income.
Barack Obama spoke for the first time Monday of tax increases to finance his plan. They would focus on eliminating the tax exonératons enjoyed by businesses and the wealthiest Americans. They would include the elimination of tax loopholes for oil and gas companies, owners of business aircraft and households with annual incomes exceeding $ 250,000.
Obama, candidate for re-election in November 2012, and Republicans have already clashed in December 2010 on the issue of tax breaks inherited from the era of George W. Bush. After a hard-won compromise, these measures were extended until the end of 2012.The announcement on taxation provoked an immediate reaction from the majority leader in the House, Eric Cantor: "I really hope that the president is not proposing that we pay for his proposals with a massive increase in taxes at the end of 2012 to create jobs that we rely on to reduce unemployment, "he warned.
"It is fair to say that this increase in taxes on job creators is the What kind of proposal rejected both parties in the past," said meanwhile Brendan Buck, spokesman for the president the House of Representatives John Boehner, leader of Republicans in Congress.
The job plan proposed Thursday by President Barack Obama is betting the recovery of consumption and public investment, at a time when the U.S. desperately needs growth drivers."Ultimately, our recovery is not caused by Washington, but our businesses and workers. But we can help," Obama said in Congress.
Growth in need of help. Fell to levels starving this year (0.7% annual rate in the first half), it is very far from being able to reduce unemployment, stuck at 9.1%. The presidential plan of $ 447 billion is allocated according to the encryption of the White House, from 57% of tax cuts and 43% of expenditure. Obama wants to invest just over $ 100 billion in the rehabilitation or construction of transport infrastructure and telecommunications, schools and homes or business premises vacant.
He also hopes to put more money into the pockets of employers and employees by giving up more than $ 250 billion in tax revenue. Hope this will help private consumption.The rest must supply targeted measures to job seekers or maintenance of public employment. Such a plan "would give a significant boost to GDP and employment in the short term," analysts have estimated the Macroeconomic Advisers, whose monthly estimates of GDP are used for dating recessions and expansions in the United States. For 2012, Macroeconomic Advisers estimated 1.3 percentage point contribution to growth, and 1.3 million jobs for the job.
Mark Zandi of Moody's Analytics, expects 2 percentage points and 1.9 million jobs. He sees "a commendable effort" of the president, but remember the risk that the plan be cut by Congress, which elected Republicans reject new spending. "There are compelling reasons why the Obama administration and Congress should provide more budgetary support to the economy," argued economist.For Goldman Sachs, instead of removing 1.1 percentage point of growth without the plan, fiscal policy in 2012 would add 0.4 percentage points with the plan.
"The private forecasters said in their initial assessment, it would make a very substantial contribution to growth at a time when we need it, and it would help to put hundreds of thousands or more Americans to work," welcomed the Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner.
"We believe the prudent and responsible thing to do now is to do more for the short-term growth," he added, in an interview on Bloomberg TV channel from Marseille.
Economists noted that Obama had not discussed the financing of these measures at this point. "The president proposes to reduce social security contributions and the financing of social protection.Yet it remains the greatest threat to long-term solvency of the United States, "said Jason Schenker, Luxury Economics. To offset the cost of those measures, Obama announced for September 19" plan deficit reduction more ambitious "than the present. No details are known at this time. To M. Schenker, it shows" that the chances of a positive effect on the labor market and the economy are limited " .